My house is over a 100 years old & single level. There is no sub floor. There is only one thickness of flooring. Even though the floor in the crawl space is insulated, this floor is cold. It has a 3" wide T&G red fir, straight grained floor & it's been sanded numerous times. The joints are not tight anymore either. I presume it was once 3/4", but after all the sanding that this floor has seen, who knows how thick it actually is now. So I'm looking to put some new T&G oak over the top of the old fir, and just use the old fir as a sub-floor. The old floor was laid across (perpendicular) the floor joists. So, which direction do I lay the new oak floor? It makes sense to run the new floor in the opposite direction of the existing fir floor. But that would have the
new floor running parallel with the joists. Not every piece of the new floor would be nailed into the joists this way. I know the joists are the main thing, but the old floor is pretty stable, in spite of it's appearance.
I'm planning on screwing the old floor into the joists, so it is solid & tight, with no squeaks. So, it makes sense to me to lay the new floor across (or perpendicular) to the existing fir floor. Will it be a stronger floor if the new floor is laid perpendicular to the existing floor instead of running the same direction as the old floor? Does this make sense?
I also didn't want to lay down any plywood substraight between the two floors due to a thickness issue meeting up with another floor in an adjoining room.
I've laid T&G floors before, but only in new construction that used OSB or plywood sub-floors, which are very stable. We always went perpendicular to the joists in these situations. So this is a new challenge for me.
Any and all comments and suggestions are welcomed. Thank you.
Starlight.