For the transition from hardwood flooring to tile, I've seen several posts recommending: 1) an expansion gap of 1/2 the width of a tile joint; 2) that's then filled to within 1/4" of the top of the gap with foam caulk backing; 3) that's then filled to the top of the gap with sanded caulk color-matched to the hardwood; and 4) that's then covered with whatever finish is used on the hardwood.
To my surprise, those posts recommended the use of sanded caulk without any inquiry about, nor any information furnished about, whether the grout used in the tile was sanded or unsanded. As it is my understanding that sanded grout is typically used when a tile joint exceeds 1/4", and because it seems highly unlikely that an expansion gap that's 1/2 the width of a tile joint is likely to exceed 1/4", the recommendation to use sanded caulk in that hardwood-to-tile transition would seem to be for some reason other than to match the material used in the tile joints. So, why do some installers seem to recommend the use of sanded caulk in the hardwood-to-tile expansion gap without knowing whether sanded grout was used in the tile joints?
A related issue is the recommendation I've seen to cover the caulk with the floor finish. Many floor finishes, when cured, are quite brittle, whereas the primary reason for using caulk is so that the material can expand and contract as necessary with changes in temperature and relative humidity. Shouldn't I expect the relatively brittle floor finish sitting over relatively flexible caulk to crack over time as the caulk expands and contracts? If so, wouldn't it be better to install the caulk without a layer of floor finish on it?
|