Amish made hardwood

It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Subfloor in a 1913 era house?
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:18 pm 
Offline
New User

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 2
I am replacing badly damaged 3/4 oak in a hallway in a house built in 1913 - about 120 sq. ft. Have ripped out all the hardwood. Subfloor is 1" x 12" rough planks nailed diagonally to joists. I planned to secure plans with deck screws but have encountered two problems. In reading your forum it seems pretty clear that subfloor needs to be very level and solid before nailing down the hardwood. Need the advice of you experts.

1.) The planks are quite rough - there are cracked pieces, knots missing and a gap of about 1/2" between boards. Seems to be some spongy spots due to this. Do I replace any damaged planks? That is must the surface be perfect or can I reply just on securing with screws into the joists?

2.) The house has settled (you would too after almost 100 years!). There is a dip over an 8' span of at least 1" in one section. I plan to lift the planks and add shim material to joists to raise the level. Should I replace with plank material - I doubt I can get 1" x 12" or can I put down 3/4" plywood in this section as long as I get the levels to match to existing?

3.) Sorry one more - If I do keep some of the planks, should nail holes and other voids in the planks be filled? If so what filler material?

Thanks - this is new project for me as you can probably tell. Found your forum to have the best info that I can rely on.

Newbie


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 

 Post subject: Re: Subfloor in a 1913 era house?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:50 am 
Offline
Prized Contributor

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 1272
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Minor voids, nail holes, etc. do not need to be filled. Gaps between the subfloor planks are also of no real concern.
Having said that, and since it is only 120 sq. ft.; have you considered removing the subfloor in this area entirely? and replacing it with 3/4 plus 1/4 ply after leveling the joists. Remember that where the subfloor runs under other existing floors, briging will be required between the joists to support then and prevent movement.

_________________
Dennis Coles
http://www.darmaga.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subfloor in a 1913 era house?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:54 am 
Offline
Most Valuable Contributor

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:42 pm
Posts: 4373
Location: Antioch, CA. 94509
1) This is normal for old subfloors. The gaps are not a problem. You should cover the subfloor planks with 15 lb. asphalt saturated roofing felt paper. If the old section did not have it, you still should put it in the area you are replacing. Be VERY careful driving screws into those old dry planks. Odds are, they will crack and split. If you must use screws, pre-drill pilot holes first.

2) If you can carefully remove the subfloor planking, fur up the joist a little, then re-install the planking without damaging it, then I say no reason why you cannot re-use it.

3) Do not bother trying to fill holes or gaps. Those are normal with these types of subfloors. You may experience some noise or squeaks with that subfloor. If you can get the noises out, great. If not, then live with it. It is an old home just doing what old homes do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subfloor in a 1913 era house?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:19 am 
Offline
New User

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 2
Thanks for both of your replies.

I will try to carefully lift old boards - but I suspect Dennis is correct. I will end up having to toss away a certain amount as it is very dry and brittle. I will end up replacing with plywood. Plus as noted, as the subfloor boards move towards inside of the house they go right underneath the wall. They will need to be cut so they can be lifted out to shim the joists. Once cut on replacing I will have to install supports between the joists close to the wall to support either the old boards or the plywood.

One thing I have learned living in an old home - very few renovation projects take less time than I planned, instead they alway take more. Like Gary says - that's just the way old home are.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subfloor in a 1913 era house?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:54 am 
Offline
Prized Contributor

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 1272
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Ya, my house was built in 1902 and has been under renovation and re-renovation for the 24 years I have owned it. So boldly going where no man should ever go, I recently purchased another house as an investment. (1917). Well it is certainly going to be an investment, lol.
But, during all of the reworking in both of these houses, I made no attempt to make the floors flat other than what I considered reasonable, replace the trim, or otherwise make it look like a new house.
I think we should carve Gary's statement in stone.

_________________
Dennis Coles
http://www.darmaga.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO