Hello,
Can some one help me to straight out the "stability" question in general and on Cumaru (Brazilian Teak, Dipteryx Odorata) specifically. I've done extensive search on the net and came to completely opposite statements about Cumaru, some sides saying it less stable then red oak some - more stable.
On parent site of this forum
http://www.hardwoodinstaller.com/hardwoodinstaller/species_brazteak.htm it stated that
Cumaru is below average where red oak is
average, and some other sites has same statements.
BUT
Here is what NWFA has:
Brazilian Teakhttp://www.woodfloors.org/consumer/whyTypesSpeciesDetail.aspx?id=43Dimensional Stability: Average (7.6; 12% more stable than red oak).
Red Oakhttp://www.woodfloors.org/consumer/whyTypesSpeciesDetail.aspx?id=15Dimensional Stability: Northern: average (8.6). Southern: below average (11.3; 31% less stable than Northern red oak)
for comparison
Mohogony (Santos)Dimensional Stability: Above average (6.2; 28% more stable than red oak).
and other sites has these:
CumaruRadial Shrinkage 5%
Tangential Shrinkage 7.6%
Volumetric Shrinkage 12%Red OakRadial Shrinkage (G->OD) 4 %
Tangential Shrink. (G->OD) 8.6 %
Volumetric Shrink. (G->OD) 13 %
Average - Change Coefficient .00369
Northern: average (8.6)
and this as well:
http://www.woodbin.com/ref/wood/shrink_table.htmJust logically thinking if wood has less shrinkage percent then that wood is more stable, so according to numbers cumaru is more stable then red oak.
I am sure i have some missing data/information that will complete the "stability" picture in my head and make Cumaru less stable then red oak but I can not figure it out what is it.
Just want to make one assumption: may be cumaru considered less stable then red because it's requires longer acclimatization then other wood and as a result more movement in the floor when it's installed in average acclimatization time?
Thank you in advance.