Three years ago we had a house fire. Our main floor was completely redone, with the exception of our wood floors. We were told they were in relatively good shape and could be saved; they'd be sanded down and refinished. THe roof was removed and left off for two weeks. In that time, the floors were totally exposed to the elements--it poured down rain and the hot summer sun beat on them. When the roof was finally put on, the company hired to do the repairs on our house brought in small dehumidifiers and let the house dry out for several days. Then they sub contracted a wood floor guy to come in, sand the floors down, and refinish them.
Maybe six months later, I noticed the filler used between the wood slats on the floor was starting to come up. I was told this was because we used wood heat as our primary heat source, which dried out the floors. The company agreed to come back to refill those cracks. It took maybe three months for that filler to start coming up. When I called about this, I was given several excuses; the filler was cracking because of my dogs' nails on the floor, the floors were in bad shape to begin with, the floors were old to begin with (the house was built in the 40's and I was told the floors were salvaged from an old school gym floor). I'm just wondering; should the floors have been replaced to begin with? The extent of my knowledge of wood floors is what I have seen on HGTV, but I do know when wood floors are rained on on any home restoration show, that's it, they start over. I have pictures but I'm not sure how to upload them.
Any advice or input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
|