Floornovice wrote:
One installer I spoke to said I should shy away from floating floors because they are considered to be temporary... He also said that they are not as resistant to moisture.. This is not inline with what I have read. He added that even the floating floors with the thicker wear layers do not add as much value as nailed down solid and that imported woods hurt home resale...
Can anyone comment on this? It would be nice to hear from someone that is not biased.
I guess I'm biased, since you have my price, and the value I bring to the installation. I ain't cheap.
Floaters are good if it is known that you have slightly high concrete vapor problems.
I would not go as far as to say it is temporary, maybe if it isn't installed right.
What makes a floater any less "resistant" to moisture?? You certainly can't float a solid wood, only engineered that is milled to be floated. Engineered is known to be better for moisture. So, that blows that installers theory out of the water.
Real wood is wood, whether it is nailed floated or glued. The installation method is not going to determine value gained or lost!!!! This guy is trying to sell you what he wants to install, not what your budget can afford. (he sounds like the cheap guy your looking for, since you would rather have it done cheaply, using the cheapest materials)
On another note... If you want to go cheap on the wood, save yourself a lot of headaches by not going to the cheapest guy on the installation.
Have you read the definition of "cheap" in the dictionary?
cheap: Not respected, Of a low price. of less quality.
cheapen: to depreciate, to beat down in price and value.
cheaply: At a small price. low quality
cheapness: State or quality of being cheap.
In other words, YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR! Expectations are seldom met, by being cheap.