@KevinD
What are your sources?
You think the big three, who have 60% of their product SKU's tied up in imported floors are just drop shipping them from China? I dont see that being feasible for the scale of their operations. Also, who has been giving the big three the most competition for the last decade? Local flooring manufacturers with overhead translating to higher prices or lower priced good from overseas, which are no longer inferior in quality if not better (Floor Covering Weekly)?
1.) My manufacturer is shipping 17 containers as of this month. Thats up from last year, and their operation is very small time, and lacks a real sales team.
2.) NWFA 2009 Market Intelligence Report - Executive Summary
http://www.nwfa.org/member/pdf/WoodFlooringExecutiveSummary2009.pdf3.) Existing home sales are up 10% for September 2010.
Obviously the NWFA report is for 2009, but with home sales gradually increasing from previous years, and home centers reporting more retail activity, I hope I am not missing something your sources are informing you on.
@Ken Fisher
I agree that the web is the future, being young myself.
I was doing some product reviews on Shaw and Mohawk's website, and they seem to be producing products with 5 plys on average and 2 mm wear layer, advertising them as having the perfect dimensional stability and not too thick of a wear layer as to allow cracking and more surface wear. I just saw that as methods to cut costs along with their HDF cores, which might be more stable and sustainable, but might also be more adversely effected by changes in humidity.
My product was once distributed by Shaw, and is of good quality. 11 ply on average. 9 coats of UV cured aluminum oxide finish. 3 mm wear layer, and good options on smooth face and textured surfaces in domestic hardwoods and exotic hardwoods.
I appreciate your input on product quality, very insightful.