You know I get this all the time. I do nail down floors over concrete. That is my thing and that is what I like to do, but you know what? It never fails, my clients always tell me that my labor is higher than a different quote and the reason is because I am putting in a sub-floor with my labor and I don’t break it out. I am competitive with glue labor when you factor in the savings over a glue install and my installs are far superior to glue and my price at the end sq. ft. for sq. ft. is lower or even. The problem is that client look for anything to pick apart and pull the price down.
The question you should be asking is, is 15 sq ft reasonable for the installation of 5” read oak and the answer is yes that is within range of the going rate for product an labor.
I surmise that some clients love the final, price but figure why not try and squeeze the install based on another estimate that the end price is higher but that one area is lower.
My typical response this is ok I will lower my wood floor labor and add on the sub-floor labor. If it’s a number game that they want to play I will show them where every penny is going.
As well If someone says that xyz is cheaper, I now require a written quote showing the competitors final price as well as the reduced price for whatever line item. Usually walking my client through the quote shows them all the areas of my quote in which they are getting superior products or techniques. If it does not convince them and they still insist on me not eating and the baby not getting shoes to install their floor. I give them Lumber Liquidator’s number and tell them it was a pleasure meeting them.
I am seriously considering just providing a sq. ft. quote to avoid this very situation. I say don’t be surprised if the installer says either no, or yeas and then subs out Best + MVP for Bruce glue or Parabond.
_________________ Heritage Crafters Co.
|