big_al wrote:
So can the trio replace an edger or not? I want to know right from someone who has actually tried it.
Also, what is your edging technique? Any tips and tricks? I've read about someone using a mechanics seat, a computer desk chair. My boss laughs, but the day I start up my own business will be the day I try the chair trick. I've also heard the Clarke B2 is better than the Super 7R. Is it heavier, harder to handle?
My technique is as follows:
Always edge left to right. Go right when following grain direction, front and back when perpendicular. I always stand with back hunched over, knees slightly bent and legs spread past shoulder width.
I used to put all my weight on the edger (oh the pain!). I've discovered recently that you don't need to do this (would have been nice to have seen the instructions if we had them). Prefinished needs a bit more pressure but let the machine do the work!
My back and elbows are always in pain. Scraping is a terrible job and kills my elbows. I can sharpen a scraper but hit a nail and start over.
There's been a lot of answers already so I'll try not to repeat what has already been said. Sorry if I do.
Anyway, I've been primarily a sand and finish expert for about 15 years give or take. My install skills are average but I don't consider myself an install expert. As for sanding, I do the type of work where you need to get on your hands and knees to find any sanding imperfections. So take my opinions with a grain of salt because not every job has to be meticulous.
Now to answer your first question, the Lagler trio does not really replace Big Machines or edgers. It's really more of an advanced or glorified buffer.It can sand a floor but will force you to take more than twice as long to sand as using the common big machines and edgers. The Trio isn't designed for rapid wood removal like a Hummel can when set to full down pressure.The trio's job is to finish off the floor after the machining and edging is done and it does it extremely well. Since it can be more aggressive than a buffer, you can sometimes leave your floor slightly rougher than you normally would (possibly saving a 2nd or 3rd cut depending on the specifics of the job) and still get the floor finished off nicely and remove all sanding lines from the big machine and any fine spinners from your edger.
Here's an example of why someone might want the trio. Some woods are a pain in the ass especially maple. I finish off oak with either 100 or 120 grit abrasives on the big machine and edger. It depends on the floor I am dealing with and the sub floor quality ,etc. Then I use my disc buffer (Bonakemi 110v)with a 120 grit screen to finish off the floor . But on maple, that wont nearly do the trick . I have to usually go 40-80-150 with my Hummel or the buffer will not get out the big machine lines. And I get the kind of jobs where there can't be big machine lines, swirls or crap in the finish.
However, if I had the trio , I could finish off maple with 100 or 120 grit on my hummel and the trio being like a edger/ buffer hybrid has the ability to get those lines out . It isn't the Hummel's fault. It's just the nature of how some woods are difficult to work with if you want a perfect job. The reason why the trio doesn't exactly replace big machines and edgers is because it is designed to abrade the floor surface very evenly and smoothly. An edger like a Clarke B2 or 7R is far more aggressive
Like I said , take my opinions with some salt because I just sanded about 800 feet of old maple and the home owner couldn't see the thousands of sanding lines and edger swirls from the last guys that sanded the floor about 12 years ago.It looked like crap to me but she really didn't notice the sanding .She was only concerned about the worn out finish.That's all most homeowners see .
Now for your next question ," is the B2 better than the 7R ?" It depends. The B2 is more aggressive , heavier, and can cut faster than a 7R. Some guys prefer it for that .I happen to have both and prefer the 7R. I prefer the 7R because it is easier to control , requires much less maintainance , cuts flatter so can sometimes do a nice fine cut than the B2 depending on how you use it. The bigger factor is that the 7R slightly slower speed and chassis shape allows it to collect far more dust than the B2. I connect my edgers to vacuum systems and the 7R is nearly dustless but the B2 is kind of a dust pig and I score a lot of points on how clean my sanding jobs are .So that factor is important to me. Some guys hate the 7R because they aren't worried about dust and just put a small bag on the B2 and go to town.
As for technique ,I usually rough most floors with 50 grit 3M paper .I start about 1 inch behind the big machine line and move perpendicular to the boards (side to side) as this gets the boards cut flat and evenly without creating a dip on the big machine line. I get my edges super flat and super even which allows me to do a final cut with 100 grit or 120 grit .I start going side to side just like my rough cut.But in each section , I also twist the edger to about the 2 O'clock position and go with the boards to get out the cross marks from the side to side sanding. I move at a nice medium tempo and keep the edger moving evenly. Not too slow and not too fast. Change the paper a lot or you'll begin to polish or burnish the wood. Some guys do just one cut of 80 grit so techniques vary.It's possible to do a godo job that way and it is also possible to do a horrible job that way.It depends on the operator.
On most jobs , my edging is at a point where my disc buffer will easily blend in the big machine line and easily take out the fine swirls that the edger normally leaves . For dark stain jobs or bad floors, I will use a 5" Dewalt orbital sander with 80 or 100 grit to blend the edges if I feel the buffer can't do it . When you sand nicely you should be able to move your hand slowly across the edges and not feel any dip on the big machine line or and high low spots .if the house is mediocre and the sub floor is all over the place, then your goal should be to blend in the highs and lows as best as possible as perfect flatness wont be possible