Anand_3 wrote:
Thanks (Dennis either you are an early riser or late sleeper!).
I read the Insulayment pdf closely and there is a section at the end (maybe they recently added it) that says for use with plywood floating subfloor over concrete, put it right on the concrete. So concrete -> insulayment -> plywood 'sandwich' --> 15lb felt --> hardwood.
This also makes sense because they claim the material has additives to prevent fungal/bacterial growth. (I think it's traditional use is on concrete for tile.)
For wood subfloor it would be as Howard stated, plywood subfloor --> insulayment --> hardwood.
Back to the nails, in my case as I'm looking at doing 3/4" only floating instead of the 2 x 1/2", without the insulayment inbetween, 1.5" nails would probably be OK: I get just a wee bit more than 1/2" into the plywood, and I conform to the NOFMA nailing schedule.
This is what I was trying to say.
Quote:
What is the logic behind laying the Insulayment on top of the plywood nailing base? Would it not help insulate the plywood substrate if it were installed under the plywood? In my way of thinking, the OP sounds as if he wants to install a plywood nailing base over concrete. Since many of us prefer the floating plywood substrate, wouldn't a better way be to:
1) lay out the 6 mil poly
2) loose lay the insulayment
3) float the plywood
4) lay out 15 lb. asphalt felt
5) nail down wood floor
Of course, one could simply eliminate the insulayment if one wanted to. It is not required for this system to work well. Out side of some potential noise reduction and helping thermal loss, I do not see much value in it for this type of installation.
Plastic sheeting, Insulayment, plywood, felt then floor. Any other way makes no sense.