Gary wrote:
IF it was explained to you that your subfloor had a problem, and that problem could pose a problem for the installation, and the installer/s recommended it be repaired, and you declined because you either did not believe them or you did not want to pay for the subfloor repairs, and then instructed the installer/s to proceed anyway and "do your best" with the situation, and now there is a problem because you did not want to pay to fix it, how would that be the installer/s fault?
I have run across this scenario more than a few times, and now, when I do, the customer signs a waiver and assumes all responsibility. Or better yet, pays me to correct the problem.
It was explained that our subfloor had a problem...but the installer said that we probably do not want to do it because it would be more money than we want to spend. He also said, that it would be more aesthetic than anything, but won't be a real problem. After hearing that, I was convinced that it was ok to proceed with the installation. If I heard otherwise, like him saying that "you will get gaps in your floors if we mess up", then I would have opted for the leveling.
FYI - I did sign a waiver, and that's where all my problems are coming from now. It really is crap, because it wasn't explained to me well. To me, it was just an excuse for the installer not having to come back out here again, and so there was a way for him to get out of the warranty if something went wrong, which it did.
And there is no doubt in my mind, if I did do the leveling, that he still would have found a way to void the warranty or not fix what's wrong. This really seems like more of an issue with the installer...and not how things should actually be done.