Sounds like he may have used #1 or #2 common grade, which is a lesser grade but still a seviceble floor. You should look in your building contract to see which grade of flooring was specified. If it wasn't specified, that's a big mistake on your part to allow the builder to select your flooring materials. Or anything else, for that matter. Because of course he will find the lowest cost product he can. Now white oak is a hardwood and it doesn't matter whether it's #2 common or clear quartersawn, the hardness will be the same. What you're probably noticing are all the flaws in the wood that are characteristic of a common grade of flooring. The foreman is correct that those floors are usually filled. You can request that they trowel fill the floor to fill all the holes and voids and that should have been done from the begining, IMO. You should take your concerns to your builder and architect to find out exactly which flooring you actually got and which flooring was specified in the architechural plans. When I do "take-offs" for a builder for flooring, most times the flooring is specified by the architect. If not, I ask the builder to clarify which grade and species he wants me to use and I note that in my proposal. To me, sounds like this wasn't paid attention to by you, the buyer, and the builder supplied the lowest cost flooring he could. A give away is using white oak as well, which is often about 10% or so less than red oak.
|